NAZARETH, ISRAEL // Pressure is mounting on Benjamin Netanyahu,
the Israeli prime minister, to bring the opposition leader Tzipi Livni into the
government after last week’s difficult meeting with the US president, according
to senior analysts.
Yaron Ezrahi, a political science professor
at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said Mr Netanyahu now understood that he
faced a stark choice between clashing with the White House and ditching the
far-right parties in his coalition.
During the talks in Washington, Barack Obama said he expected an
immediate halt to settlement building, a move rejected by Mr Netanyahu’s main
coalition partners and many in his own right-wing Likud Party.
The Israeli prime minister hinted this week he will probably
renew the call for Ms Livni, the leader of Kadima, a centrist party, to join the
coalition after his failure to tempt her into a unity government following
February’s general election.
Highlighting the alleged threat of Iran’s gaining a nuclear
warhead as the main danger facing Israel, he told his party on Monday the
priority was to “reach as broad a national unity as possible to repel the
danger. Our relations with the United States are important and we must preserve
them”.
Prof Ezrahi said: “As long as Netanyahu didn’t know how obstinate
Obama was going to be, he could afford to ignore all the signs coming from the
White House. But after the talks in Washington, Netanyahu’s hand is considerably
weaker.
“Netanyahu and Livni are now indispensable to each other.”
Tensions within the current coalition have mounted over the past
week, particularly over indications that Mr Netanyahu may try to dismantle a
handful of tiny outpost settlements as a minimal concession to the US
administration.
The White House is demanding an immediate freeze on all
settlement expansion in the West Bank to prepare the ground for a peace deal
with the Palestinians.
Mr Netanyahu is opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state
and is offering a much vaguer “economic peace”.
Yesterday, Dan Meridor, the intelligence agencies minister, met
US officials in Britain in what the Israeli media described as an attempt to
persuade the White House to allow continued expansion of the larger settlements
in return for a crackdown on two dozen outposts.
Ehud Barak, the defence minister and leader
of the much-diminished left-wing Labor party, is expected to convey the same
message on a trip to Washington next week.
Last Thursday Mr Barak sent in security forces to dismantle one
outpost, Maoz Esther, east of Ramallah, that consisted of five huts and two
tents. There are more than 100 similar outposts across the West Bank, ostensibly
unauthorised by the government and housing a few thousand settlers.
On Monday Mr Barak also approved “zoning notices” against a
further 10 outposts, setting in motion proceedings that could eventually lead to
their demolition.
He promised to dismantle a total of 26 outposts, a pledge Israel
made to the previous US administration of George W Bush but has yet to fulfil.
Observers, however, were largely unimpressed by the supposedly
tough new stance. It was the fourth time Maoz Esther has been dismantled and, as
on previous occasions, the settlers were allowed back a few hours later.
Uri Avnery, leader of the Gush Shalom peace group, accused Mr
Barak of conducting only “a performance of ‘demolishing outposts’”.
Nehemia Strasler, of the liberal Haaretz
newspaper, argued that the spectacle was meant to “divert [US] attention from
the construction taking place all over the West Bank”.
At a cabinet meeting on Sunday, the right-wing parties vied in
denouncing Mr Barak, with one calling his move a “witch-hunt” against the
settlers. The next day Mr Netanyahu tried to reassure his party by suggesting
the crackdown on outposts would win US backing for Israel’s hard line on Iran.
Writing in Haaretz, Aluf Benn, another columnist for the paper,
noted: “Netanyahu is in a trap: the more he tries to persuade Obama he can
provide the diplomatic goods, the quicker his coalition will expire.”
Mr Netanyahu’s only saviour, according to Prof Ezrahi, is his
chief rival for power, Ms Livni. He said the Israeli public expected unity from
senior politicians during times of crisis and neither Mr Netanyahu nor Ms Livni
would want to be seen wrecking the chances of a unity government.
“Israelis believe the country’s existence totally depends on US
support and will judge harshly any leader who risks jeopardising that
relationship. That is the most pressing political constraint on Mr Netanyahu.”
Ms Livni added to the pressure on Mr Netanyahu this week. She
accused him of “bad management” and said Israel was “witnessing signs of a
diplomatic collapse”.
Yesterday she criticised the government’s preference for the road
map, a US peace plan from 2003, saying it delayed direct talks with the
Palestinians for too long.
“Refraining from talking will bring us to a situation in which we
won’t have a partner for talks,” she told Army Radio.
Ms Livni faces her own political constraints. Shaul Mofaz, her
main challenger to lead Kadima, has been lobbying among colleagues against her
earlier refusal to join the coalition.
He added that most Kadima legislators privately agreed with him
on the need for a unity government.
Share this Article
Here is your
chance to help this article to be read by thousands more people by sharing it on your favourite social networking site. You can also email the
article from here.
